Showing posts with label art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art. Show all posts

Monday, 23 February 2009

Jean Cameron, Producer of Glasgow International (Gi)

Jean Cameron, Produce of Gi, discusses Glasgow International Festival of Contemporary Art.

Notes:

• Difference between 'festival' and '
biennale'

• Relationship between producer, curator, artist and audience

Bourriaud: "art is the thing upon and around which subjectivity can reform itself, the way that several light spots are brought together to form a beam and light up a single point." Fluidity and interconnection of audiences and contexts of exhibition and dissemination.

• Who are the people who are seeing your work, who is disseminating your work? What is the profile of who is seeing your work presently and who would you like to see your work?

• Age, transport, disposable income, reading tastes, friends, gender, professional involvement in the arts,

• Audiences: Collector/buyer; financial issues of finding links to dealers and galleries, thinking of that process cooperatively in terms of artist's network, artist-led gallery, etc.

• Issues:
DIY, commercial galleries, sales commission, context of showing work, integrity of work, what is the first consideration of making the work? Who is buying? What's the market? Which dealer, gallery, agent? What is their reach? Local, sustainable, authentic art scene?

• Glasgow art market, scene developed out a recessional culture, post-industrial landscape, not dependent on market, studios, spaces, education, artists' collectives such as Transmission, dealers picking up on what is interesting there ... now Glasgow has three commercial galleries dealing with contemporary art (e.g. Modern Institute).

• York already captures large international audiences but not for art. Comparison to Leeds: largest per
capita income without a serious commercial gallery.

• audiences: anyone who can provide opportunity just to show work, more important that work is seen than bought. Different forms of capital (cultural, social, economic, political), developing symbolic capital of reputation.

• audiences: someone who appreciates the work, developing relationships, widest possible audience for the work, public collections as well as private collections, making things the artist wants to make,
'selling the artist rather than the art'?

• strategies around presentations: proactive / reactive.

• audiences: work gets written about, appearing in publications, discussed, considered ...

• potential use of blog as space of critical writing, critical debate

• audiences: academic, professional, intellectual audience (wanting the work to be seen, discussed, considered ... ) - does the work exist in a context of research primarily?

• development, critique - sustain, advance and develop the work ... 

• which of these audiences actually exist here in York and to what extent?

• self-referential frame of reference: what about wider publics? children, education, publicly sited work, festivals

• models of commissions, residence, public funding

why is the work being made?

• future of private market, commodity culture, white cube and gagosian redundancies / cutbacks.

• expectation / anticipation of publics ... 

- - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - 

Presentation on Gi

2005-2006: First annual outings of festival around Glasgow Art Fair, supported by funders, etc

Funders:

Culture and Sport Glasgow
Glasgow City Council
Glasgow City Marketing Bureau
Event Scotland
Scottish Arts Council
Scottish Enterprise

imperatives around economic impact, cultural tourism: complexity of negotiating imperatives but yet wide cross-referencing of provision and support.

Glasgow will be host of 2014 Commonwealth Games

Gi 2008: audience evaluation and break down, majority of under 45s.

global context over 200 contemporary art biennales across the globe compared with 4 or 5 twenty years ago.

commissioned programme of local and international work; encouraging and co-ordinating the contributions of Glasgow's visual arts organisations and artists; providing the basis from which to develop an artistically driven education/outreach activity and periphery programme that is coherent within the overall festival. 

collaborations and co-operations; additional space; 'open submission' channel for 2010

open submission announced mid-April; curatorial theme for 2010: past, present, future

keywords: equality, intelligence, (re) discovery, good times

examples of event-based work from previous festival:


web strategy: Gi is public for 2 weeks every 24 months. Web is particularly important as a presence. need to curate form and content. issues of documentation - not of work itself but of atmosphere and social context (not trying to use web as gallery) - use of youtube channels and myspace, making links, association, not trying

page of proposal, biography and link but not online gallery. web is about people looking for you and so other methods are needed to bring your work toward wider audience who don't know you are there. Flyers and maps, hard copy pointers towards url.

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

website critique: i-DAT

i-DAT is a ‘Centre of Expertise’ located in the Faculty of Technology at the University of Plymouth, and acts as a catalyst for creative research and innovation across the fields of Art, Science and Technology, facilitating regional, national and international collaborations and cultural projects

Please leave comments on what we should learn from this site in terms of developing our own project.

website critique: iniva - Creative Mapping

Iniva creates exhibitions, publications, digital projects, education and research projects, designed to bring the work of artists from culturally diverse backgrounds to the attention of the widest possible public. Anchored in the diversity of contemporary British culture and society, Iniva engages with culturally diverse practices and ideas, both local and global.

Creative Mapping: An ongoing schools project for artists and students to explore mapping and ideas about identity, place and power.

Please leave comments on what we should learn from this site in terms of developing our own project.

website critique: Gallery 9 - Walker Art Center

"Gallery 9 is the Walker Art Center's online exhibition space. Between 1997 and 2003, under the direction of Steve Dietz, Gallery 9 presented the work of more than 100 artists and became one of the most recognized online venues for the exhibition and contextualization of Internet-based art."

Please leave comments on what we should learn from this site in terms of developing our own project.

website critique: netzspannung.org

"netzspannung.org is an Internet platform for artistic production, media projects, and intermedia research. As an interface between media art, media technology and society, it functions as an information pool for artists, designers, computer scientists and cultural scientists. Headed by » Monika Fleischmann and » Wolfgang Strauss, at the » MARS Exploratory Media Lab, interdisciplinary teams of architects, artists, designers, computer scientists, art and media scientists are developing and producing tools and interfaces, artistic projects and events at the interface between art and research. All developments and productions are realised in the context of national and international projects."

Please leave comments on what we should learn from this site in terms of developing our own project.

Monday, 9 February 2009

website critique: Rhizome

"Rhizome is dedicated to the creation, presentation, preservation, and critique of emerging artistic practices that engage technology. Through open platforms for exchange and collaboration, our website serves to encourage and expand the communities around these practices. Our programs, many of which happen online, include commissions, exhibitions, events, discussion, archives and portfolios. We support artists working at the furthest reaches of technological experimentation as well as those responding to the broader aesthetic and political implications of new tools and media. Our organizational voice draws attention to artists, their work, their perspectives and the complex interrelationships between technology, art and culture."

Please leave comments on what we should learn from this site in terms of developing our own project.

Followers